[Ground-station] Call for Input - meeting with legal team about ITAR/EAR results
Samudra Haque [TTLLC]
sehaque at tekterrain.com
Wed Sep 8 15:36:31 PDT 2021
I wonder if an ITAR compliance checklist (a check off style web form) for contributors could be used when they upload/share content? At the very least it could contain a public URL / bibliography / citation of research materials utilized in a project. Could also be a free form submission – though that would be harder to keep track of.
Samudra N3RDX
From: Ground-Station <ground-station-bounces at lists.openresearch.institute> On Behalf Of Frank Brickle via Ground-Station
Sent: Wednesday, September 8, 2021 6:32 PM
To: Bruce Perens <bruce at perens.com>
Cc: Michelle Thompson via Ground-Station <ground-station at lists.openresearch.institute>
Subject: Re: [Ground-station] Call for Input - meeting with legal team about ITAR/EAR results
Yes, that was the message we got during the original AMSAT screw-up that led to Lyle and Chuck heading for the hills. But part of the message then was that what counted as "public" was subject to interpretation. I would like to believe this has been clarified.
On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 3:20 PM Bruce Perens <bruce at perens.com<mailto:bruce at perens.com>> wrote:
Yes, I wrote this a long time ago and I believe it's still on the ORI site. Essentially the rule is absolutely everything has to be done in the public.
On Wed, Sep 8, 2021, 15:14 Frank Brickle via Ground-Station <ground-station at lists.openresearch.institute<mailto:ground-station at lists.openresearch.institute>> wrote:
Q: Is there one simple rule of thumb that can be relied on to keep you out of trouble with ITAR/EAR?
On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 11:02 AM Michelle Thompson via Ground-Station <ground-station at lists.openresearch.institute<mailto:ground-station at lists.openresearch.institute>> wrote:
Call for Input: Meeting tomorrow (Thursday, 9 September 2021) with Thomsen and Burke about the ITAR/EAR regulatory results. They want me to bring misconceptions and frequently asked questions in order to better craft a FAQ and implementation guidelines.
Quotes would help, but paraphrasing any objections you have heard would be just as useful.
-Michelle W5NYV
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openresearch.institute/pipermail/ground-station-openresearch.institute/attachments/20210908/8ba58d93/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Ground-Station
mailing list