[Ground-station] Call for Input - meeting with legal team about ITAR/EAR results

[Frank Brickle]

Yes, that was the message we got during the original AMSAT screw-up that
led to Lyle and Chuck heading for the hills. But part of the message then
was that what counted as "public" was subject to interpretation. I would
like to believe this has been clarified.

On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 3:20 PM Bruce Perens <bruce at perens.com> wrote:

> Yes, I wrote this a long time ago and I believe it's still on the ORI
> site. Essentially the rule is absolutely everything has to be done in the
> public.
>
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2021, 15:14 Frank Brickle via Ground-Station
> <ground-station at lists.openresearch.institute> wrote:
>
>> Q: Is there one simple rule of thumb that can be relied on to keep you
>> out of trouble with ITAR/EAR?
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 11:02 AM Michelle Thompson via Ground-Station
>> <ground-station at lists.openresearch.institute> wrote:
>>
>>> Call for Input: Meeting tomorrow (Thursday, 9 September 2021) with
>>> Thomsen and Burke about the ITAR/EAR regulatory results. They want me to
>>> bring misconceptions and frequently asked questions in order to better
>>> craft a FAQ and implementation guidelines.
>>>
>>> Quotes would help, but paraphrasing any objections you have heard would
>>> be just as useful.
>>>
>>> -Michelle W5NYV
>>>
>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openresearch.institute/pipermail/ground-station-openresearch.institute/attachments/20210908/04e6023f/attachment.html>