[Ground-station] Ground-Station Digest, Vol 18, Issue 16
Michelle Thompson
mountain.michelle at gmail.com
Tue Oct 1 13:00:57 PDT 2019
Thank you so much Thomas. I enthusiastically take you up on the offer!
Wally Ritchie and others are working hard on the detailed proposal
documents for the payload, but a system level definition should not clash
with that. We all welcome your experience and enthusiasm. I'll make sure
you're added to the repository if you are not already.
-Michelle W5NYV
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 11:01 AM Thomas Parry via Ground-Station
<ground-station at lists.openresearch.institute> wrote:
> I fully agree with your point 2. What is the best way to progress the
> space segment, start pulling together a system level definition on the
> github space repository?
>
> I have experience doing satellite design at a top nanosatellite
> manufacturer plus ESA project tech R&D at the IC design level so I can hit
> the ground running but also don't want to clash with other work you may
> have done.
>
> Cheers,
> Thomas
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openresearch.institute/pipermail/ground-station-openresearch.institute/attachments/20191001/9cd20178/attachment.html>
More information about the Ground-Station
mailing list