[Ground-station] Spectrum gain?

[Mariana Varotto]

Yes, maybe they got it wrong... My interpretation was that secondary, non-federal radiolocation operations were relocated from 3.3-3.55 GHz to 2.9-3 GHz (III.B. paragraphs 27-3 -- it says they’re kicked out of 3+ GHz and reallocated to 2.9-3 GHz, which already hosts non-federal radio location as secondary, including NEXRAD from NWS). 
But amateurs are kicked out of 3+ GHz entirely (III.C. paragraph 34), and not relocated since they "also have access to a large number of other bands” (ref. in footnotes), including the 2 GHz and 5 GHz bands which should have similar propagation characteristics as 3 GHz (paragraphs 35 & 37)… :-(

- Mariana WA7EE 


> On Oct 9, 2020, at 4:11 PM, Douglas Quagliana via Ground-Station <ground-station at lists.openresearch.institute> wrote:
> 
> I went and looked up The Amateur Radio Newsline website, which includes a script of their podcast at
> 
> https://www.arnewsline.org/s/nsln2241.txt <https://www.arnewsline.org/s/nsln2241.txt>
> 
> Quoting from their script: "Hams and other users are being relocated to a band between 2.9 and 3.0 GHz on a secondary basis to federal government service operators."
> I have not seen references to a "move" to 2.9 GHz for amateurs mentioned anywhere else.  Maybe Amateur Radio Newsline got it wrong?
> 
> 73,
> Douglas KA2UPW/5
> 
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 2:19 PM Michelle Thompson via Ground-Station <ground-station at lists.openresearch.institute> wrote:
> Did Region 2 get spectrum at 2.9-3.0 GHz? 
> 
> One of us heard about it on amateur radio news line's podcast. 
> 
> 
> -Michelle W5NYV
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openresearch.institute/pipermail/ground-station-openresearch.institute/attachments/20201009/0b7e3ab9/attachment.html>