[Board] Fwd: LNA proposal

[Steve Conklin]

The proposal itself looks really good. The costs for labor and materials
look reasonable, and the goals are clear.

I would have liked to have seen a more specific description of how the
experimental results will be delivered, but I also know that in this sort
of work, it's assumed to be in papers describing the work.

Beyond the proposal itself, this is really a perfect fit for ORI in terms
of research and just as important, the capabilities of the people
performing it and their facility.

In terms of a network building experience for ARI, it would be fantastic.

Steve


On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 9:36 AM Michelle Thompson <
mountain.michelle at gmail.com> wrote:

> We've been asked to review and provide feedback for the below proposal.
>
> ASTROBi wants to work with us on communications.
>
> Initial phone calls were good and this work supports a mission that is the
> second-priority item in the decadal NASA study.
>
> Please read over and let me know what needs improvement or what's "done
> good."
>
> -Michelle Thompson
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Erik Buehler <erik at astrobi.space>
> Date: Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 1:23 PM
> Subject: Fwd: LNA proposal
> To: Michelle Thompson <mountain.michelle at gmail.com>
>
>
> Hi Michelle,
>
> I hope all is well. I'm forwarding the final cryo-LNA proposal that I
> mentioned was coming. The array proposal is probably a couple of weeks out.
> I'll be curious to hear what you think.
>
> Cheers,
> - Erik
>
> _______________________________________________
> Board mailing list
> Board at lists.openresearch.institute
>
> http://lists.openresearch.institute/listinfo.cgi/board-openresearch.institute
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openresearch.institute/pipermail/board-openresearch.institute/attachments/20220621/3252ec6f/attachment.html>