<html><head></head><body><div class="ydp848ff191yahoo-style-wrap" style="font-family:Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:16px;"><div></div>
<div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">The -200C would be my problem.</div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><br></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">Heck, most of the atmosphere becomes a liquid near that temp.</div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><br></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><br></div><div><br></div>
</div><div id="ydp2cd907c0yahoo_quoted_3843763896" class="ydp2cd907c0yahoo_quoted">
<div style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:#26282a;">
<div>
On Thursday, July 2, 2020, 12:06:31 PM CDT, Michelle Thompson via Ground-Station <ground-station@lists.openresearch.institute> wrote:
</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div><div id="ydp2cd907c0yiv7741770048"><div dir="ltr">Anyone have access to any type of temperature chamber, anywhere to test some antennas?<br><br>For Gateway, temp range is expected to be -200 to +160 C. <br><br>I'd like to get any results, even if it's "only" industrial range, for the antennas that we currently have in hand for 5 GHz/10 GHz. <br><br>This would start to produce results that could be compared to later results, when the revisions of the designs for Gateway start getting turned into molecules. Showing improvement over temperature is super important and starting now greatly reduces risk. <br><br clear="all"><div><div dir="ltr" class="ydp2cd907c0yiv7741770048gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">-Michelle W5NYV<br><br><div dir="ltr"><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
</div>
</div></body></html>