[Ground-station] ORI Decision Tree - for review

[Bruce Perens]

I am parsing the decision tree this way:

Is the information about a spacecraft, satellite, or space vehicle
regardless of whether it is military, commercial, or amateur?
YES - the information may be subject to ITAR, go no farther
NO - Is the information dual-use?
    YES - Publish it and go ahead, even if it potentially has a
military application.
    NO - It may be subject to EAR, regardless of whether it has any
military application.

On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 3:45 PM Bruce Perens <bruce at perens.com> wrote:
>
> Also, the example of military or defense parts, articles, or services
> does not include any military use and does include commercial and
> scientific uses. This seems garbled or something. If these came from
> the attorneys, we need to work or clarification .
>
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 3:41 PM Bruce Perens <bruce at perens.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dual-use is not defined, and it looks to me like the decision for
> > dual-use is reversed.
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 3:31 PM Michelle Thompson via Ground-Station
> > <ground-station at lists.openresearch.institute> wrote:
> > >
> > > Here's an ORI Decision Tree for review. Please post comments and questions.
> > >
> > > This is intended to be part of the regulatory folder in the documents repository.
> > >
> > > -Michelle W5NYV
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Bruce Perens K6BP
> > - Board Partner, OSS Capital LLC Venture Capital
> > - CEO, undisclosed startup
>
>
>
> --
> Bruce Perens K6BP
> - Board Partner, OSS Capital LLC Venture Capital
> - CEO, undisclosed startup



-- 
Bruce Perens K6BP
- Board Partner, OSS Capital LLC Venture Capital
- CEO, undisclosed startup