[Board] passive radar / ITAR/ open source
Michelle Thompson
mountain.michelle at gmail.com
Sun Nov 20 08:56:15 PST 2022
Just checking in - is there anything you need?
-mdt
On Sun, Nov 13, 2022, 17:29 Michelle Thompson <mountain.michelle at gmail.com>
wrote:
> We support you and are here however we can help, you have a lot of
> people pulling for you and the project, and you've got the best
> possible team at T&B.
>
> -Michelle Thompson
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 1:27 AM The Kraken <thekraken at krakenrf.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Michelle,
> >
> > I'm glad that we coincidentally had already retained T&B. We are
> currently working with Maher Shomali, as we came into the firm through
> their internal ITAR consultant, Jason Knowles. I also already emailed
> info at eff.org.
> >
> > It would be great if we could actually offer the thing we've been
> working on for over three years. But who knows...
> >
> > Syed
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 7:02 PM Michelle Thompson <
> mountain.michelle at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Greetings Syed,
> >>
> >> We’ll help however we can.
> >>
> >> EFF will undoubtedly be sympathetic, supportive, and helpful.
> >>
> >> We worked with Roszel Thomsen at Thomsen and Burke, and several of his
> staff. I highly recommend them for both expertise in this regulatory field
> and also having an understanding of and positive view of open source.
> >>
> >> They welcome direct contact, but if there’s any difficulties in getting
> in touch with them, then please let us know.
> >>
> >> -Michelle Thompson
> >>
> >> On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 15:41 The Kraken <thekraken at krakenrf.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Michelle,
> >>>
> >>> This is Syed. We were in touch regarding the amateur satellite
> project. I'm also involved with KrakenRF (co-owner). Carl, who is my
> partner on KrakenRF and runs rtl-sdr.com, mentioned your tweets related
> to our situation.
> >>>
> >>> Are you able to provide any additional information surrounding open
> source code and ITAR? I did read your ITAR/EAR notice, but I don't think it
> applies to us because we sell hardware and provide instructions on how to
> use the passive radar software (which is open source).
> >>>
> >>> Do you think this might be of interest to EFF? I assume no, as I don't
> think there would be any litigation involved with any of this.
> >>>
> >>> Who did you work with at Thomsen & Burke?
> >>>
> >>> Syed
> >>>
> >>>
> >> --
> >> -Michelle Thompson
> >>
> >> "Potestatem obscuri lateris nescis."
> >>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openresearch.institute/pipermail/board-openresearch.institute/attachments/20221120/62f09a78/attachment.htm>
More information about the Board
mailing list